11/13/2022 0 Comments Index of / parent directory cacheman![]() On Ubuntu this is implemented temporarily via sudo (switch user and do). Root is the only administrator of the system. Should they instead be assigned to the root? I gave manager ownership of all the company files. When I transferred files to the server, I created an account for myself named manager. Let me go back a step, since this is my first set up of a server. Thanks for the reply, I read the article. I added the word "mand" to the fstab, but this does not seem to have made any difference. The problem at present is there is no file locking, so more than one person can open and edit the same file. Īlso, I have set the group sticky bit recursively for all three of the group folders. Passwd chat = *Enter\snew\s*\spassword:* %n\n *Retype\snew\s*\spassword:* %n\n *password\supdated\ssuccessfully*. Panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d Write list = maindesk frontdesk guy john spa Here is the latest version of the shares in smb.conf, including global The directory contents ownership and permissions is just as important as that if the parent directory's. ![]() To be honest, this is only part of the smb.conf. Things don't go well if you do don't follow the order of the commands. It helps to do this in the order I described. # Note the above is only needed on the root directory (the shared directory)Īll of this should be done by the root user (via sudo). Now all that is left is for you to set the sgid but with this command I usually set the ownership first (chown) and then set the permissions (chmod) from the root of that file system (say /srv/samba/beacon) with thisĭid you mean to create a separate file system branch at /srv/samba/foothils ? You can set a directory user-group ownership to a user-group that contains multiple users, but you will need a method to "inherit" the user-group of that directory. If you want to limit the access to the owner and user-group you can use this This is more appropriate for a typical Linux file system that is going to be shared using Samba Allowing a remote user the ability to create malicious eXecutable scripts subverts all of the Linux security conventions. This is even worse for remote users of the shared directory. Imagine if that logged in user created a script that when executed would delete all the files in the shared directory. There is absolutely no reason to allow a user the ability to create a eXecutable file in any shared directory. This works for most global users (others). This means r-x (5) allows a user to read but not write to the contends of a directory. The X for directories allows the user to descend into the directory while th r allows the user to read the contents. You never need to resort to 777 for and directory or file. john:john or jane:jane or some such) with permissions of 775 for directories and 664 for files. For Ubuntu this means : for ownership (e.g. The ownership and permissions set when a file is created locally (by a Linux user) is determined by the User Private Groups (UPC) and the umask. It's hard to tell exactly what you have going on here. If I create a new file, the permissions are different.ĭrwxrwx- 15 manager beaconFiles 4096 May 20 11:47 beaconFilesĭrwxrwx- 6 manager finance 4096 finance ![]() I can rename the file but not edit and save the changes. Mostly working, but users don't seem to have correct write access. Trying to set up a samba server on Ubuntu server with groups and users. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |